French comedian Dieudonné M’bala M’bala in 2007. Photo by Alexandre Hervaud via Flickr

The U.K. Home Office announced yesterday that French comedian Dieudonné M’bala M’bala has been banned from entering Britain. The decision came weeks after Dieudonné, who has been convicted for hate speech against Jews in France, canceled his nationwide tour when the government banned his opening performance.

Dieudonné had said he would visit Nicolas Anelka, a French soccer player based in England who faces a minimum five-match ban for performing the comic’s trademark “quenelle” gesture, a vaguely anti-Semitic anti-establishment reverse-Nazi salute.

This is hardly the first time a controversial public figure has been barred from Britain’s borders.

In 2009, the Home Office banned anti-Islam Dutch MP Geert Wilders and the Westboro Baptist Church’s infamous head Fred Phelps from entering the U.K.

In June 2013, Britain banned anti-Islam bloggers Pamela Gellar and Robert Spencer, who planned to speak at a far-right English Defence League march near where British Army soldier Lee Rigby was brutally murdered by Islamist extremists.

A government spokesperson justified the decision, saying individuals whose presence “is not conducive to the public good” could be banned from Britain.

As my friend and former colleague over at Index on Censorship Padraig Reidy wrote at the time:

“If these people break the law while in the country, and are prosecuted and barred, whether for hate speech, incitement to violence or relevant criminal offences, then at least it can be said that we are all subject to the same law, and the law has been broken. But this pre-emptive extra-judicial move is a strategy that risks undermining cohesion and entrenching bitterness in an already vicious argument.”

When unpopular speech is suppressed or outright banned, society misses an important opportunity to question and to challenge hateful opinions in the public square.

If Dieudonné were to instruct an anti-Semitic crowd to “go kill the Jews next door,” he’d be inciting imminent violence, which few people or governments would regard as speech worthy of protection.

But to preemptively ban him and other haters from entering Britain or speaking out reinforces divisiveness. It turns them into free speech martyrs. It suppresses the expression of harmful and hateful views held by some members of society, allowing them go unexamined and unchecked.

Barring the clear and present danger associated with incitement to imminent violence, we should let the marketplace of ideas determine the limits of acceptable speech.


  1. The standards you mention are all US standards. They simply don’t apply in the UK.

    Additionally, it’s not just hate speech that is banned, but the disorder it can and will cause and has caused. Sure, it’s a slippery slope, but the slope gets much more slippery when these people speak.

    I believe America bans certain hate speakers from coming here as well.

  2. Brian Pellot

    Brian Pellot

    Post author

    You’re absolutely right that I’m using very US-centric language (clear and present danger, inciting imminent violence, etc.). I’m doing so prescriptively, saying these are good universal tests, not saying they are the actual standards used in given countries. These are my opinions.

  3. Brian,
    great article. I have read a bit about this French Comedian and it is my POV that his comedy is more a social catalyst for change in the governmental structure rather than an outright bashing of Jews. France’s version of AIPAC won the battle years ago and the things we might hear from someone like Geller would not be ridiculed yet Dieudonné is. I think it is more a use of the old trick “anti-semitism” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uW3a1bw5XlE

  4. British Govt. has committed a blunder by not allowing Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer to speak in Britain. It is surprising that British Govt. is Clamping down on free speech.. Every one has right to speak their thoughts and mind. Britain who once was a model country of the world and a champion of Liberty and free speech has turned against it?. And that too just to appease Islamic fanaticism?. It is certainly mind boggling and unbelievable. It appears that present day Britain is definitely not being led by mentally sound bodies.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments with many links may be automatically held for moderation.